Skip to study content

UGC NET Social Work · Subject Code 10

Unit I

Nature and Development of Social Work

A point-by-point study guide covering the official Unit I syllabus, from foundational concepts and historical development to professionalization, ethics, theory, and contemporary practice.

01

Definition, nature, scope, goals and process of Social Work

Social work is both a practice-based profession and an academic discipline. The International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) describes it as a field concerned with social change and development, social cohesion, empowerment and liberation, grounded in social justice, human rights, collective responsibility and respect for diversity (International Federation of Social Workers [IFSW], 2014).

Nature. Social work is person-and-environment oriented: it considers people in relation to families, groups, organizations, communities and wider social conditions. Its work can therefore involve direct helping as well as organizational, community, policy, advocacy, research and educational activity.

Scope. The field spans individual and collective wellbeing and includes practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations and communities. The professional mission also addresses environmental and structural forces that contribute to problems in living (National Association of Social Workers [NASW], 2021).

Goals. In broad terms, Social Work seeks to enhance wellbeing, strengthen people’s capacity to address needs, promote social justice and human rights, and support social change. These goals must be interpreted in relation to context, culture, diversity and the responsibilities of professional practice.

Process. Social Work practice is purposeful and reflective rather than simply charitable. It commonly involves understanding a situation, identifying needs and strengths, agreeing on goals, selecting appropriate interventions, reviewing outcomes and learning from practice. The precise sequence varies by method and setting; the Unit I syllabus does not prescribe a single universal process model.

02

Historical development in the U.K., U.S.A. and India

The development of modern Social Work is closely connected with organized responses to poverty, industrialization, urbanization and changing social conditions in Europe and North America during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Oxford’s Encyclopedia of Social Work traces the profession from voluntary efforts addressing the “social question” through occupational development and professionalization in the early twentieth century (Stuart, 2013).

United Kingdom

British developments include organized poor relief and later reform-oriented approaches to poverty and social conditions. For study purposes, the key historical theme is the movement from informal charity toward more organized, systematic and professionally informed social assistance.

United States

Two historical streams are especially important. Charity Organization Societies emphasized systematic investigation and coordination of assistance, while the Settlement House Movement placed reformers in communities and paid sustained attention to environmental and structural conditions. Jane Addams and Hull House are central to the settlement tradition (University of Michigan School of Social Work, n.d.).

India

Indian Social Work developed through a combination of indigenous traditions of social service, social and religious reform, voluntary action, responses to poverty and inequality, and later professional education. Professional Social Work education in India began in 1936 with the establishment of the Dorabji Tata Graduate School of Social Work, later renamed the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (Dash, 2017; Tata Group, n.d.).

03

Social reform, professionalization and the development of Social Work

Social Work developed through an interaction between service and social reform. Historical accounts of the profession show the importance of both individualized assistance and efforts to change social and environmental conditions. The Charity Organization and settlement traditions are often used to illustrate these different emphases, although modern Social Work does not require choosing one and rejecting the other (Stuart, 2013; Thompson et al., 2019).

Professionalization involves the development of specialized knowledge, formal education and training, professional roles, ethical standards, organizations and accepted standards of practice. The growth of formal education and methods of practice helped transform social betterment from largely voluntary activity into an established profession (Stuart, 2013).

Professionalization does not mean abandoning the field’s reform orientation. Contemporary international standards explicitly connect Social Work education with professional values, ethics, human rights, social and economic justice, research and practice education (IFSW & International Association of Schools of Social Work [IASSW], 2020).

04

Social Work as a profession in India

Professional Social Work in India is associated with the institutional development of Social Work education, fieldwork and organized practice. The establishment of the Dorabji Tata Graduate School of Social Work in 1936 is widely recognized as a landmark in the history of professional Social Work education in India (Dash, 2017).

Indian professional Social Work has developed across multiple practice areas and has interacted with welfare institutions, voluntary organizations, communities and public policy. Its professional identity therefore combines formal knowledge and training with attention to Indian social realities and locally relevant approaches.

For UGC NET preparation, keep the distinction clear between professional Social Work—organized around specialized education, competence and ethical practice—and the much broader history of social service and philanthropy in India.

05

Values, competencies and code of ethics

Values provide the ethical orientation of Social Work, while competencies refer to the knowledge, skills, judgement and professional capacities required to practice responsibly. The IFSW global definition identifies human dignity, human rights, social justice, collective responsibility and respect for diversity as central principles (IFSW, 2014).

Core professional values

  • Service: commitment to helping people and addressing social problems.
  • Social justice: attention to inequality, discrimination, oppression and barriers to resources and participation.
  • Dignity and worth of the person: respect for persons and their individuality.
  • Importance of human relationships: recognition that relationships can be central vehicles for change.
  • Integrity: trustworthy and responsible professional conduct.
  • Competence: practice within one’s knowledge and abilities and continued professional development.

These six values are explicitly identified in the NASW Code of Ethics. The Code also provides standards for ethical responsibilities to clients, colleagues, practice settings, the profession and broader society (NASW, 2021).

Ethics in practice

Ethics matters because professional decisions can involve competing responsibilities. A code of ethics provides principles and standards for judgement; it does not remove the need for professional reasoning. The 2021 NASW revisions also strengthened attention to professional self-care and cultural competence (NASW, 2021).

06

Theories for Social Work practice

Theories help social workers interpret situations, understand relationships between people and environments, formulate explanations, and make more reasoned practice decisions. Theory does not replace professional judgement; it provides conceptual frameworks that can be tested against evidence, context and practice experience.

Psychological perspectives

Psychodynamic, behavioural, cognitive and humanistic approaches offer different explanations of behaviour and change. Their relevance depends on the client system, problem, setting and intervention goal (Deacon & Macdonald, 2017).

Systems and ecological perspectives

Systems thinking emphasizes interdependence among parts of a system. Ecological and person-in-environment perspectives place individual experiences within wider social and environmental contexts (Langer & Lietz, 2014; Mattaini, 2008).

Strengths perspective

The strengths perspective directs attention toward capabilities, resources, resilience and possibilities for change rather than defining people only through problems or deficits (Langer & Lietz, 2014).

Critical and emancipatory perspectives

Critical traditions examine power, inequality, oppression and structural conditions and connect individual experience with broader social change. These perspectives complement the profession’s social justice orientation.

The syllabus names “theories for Social Work practice” without prescribing a single list of theories. The frameworks above are therefore presented as academically supported examples, not as an exhaustive official syllabus list.

07

Changing contexts, trends and challenges

Social Work practice changes as social conditions, institutions, technologies, inequalities and patterns of human need change. Contemporary education standards emphasize current curricula, research, equity and diversity, human rights, social, economic and environmental justice, and attention to local and Indigenous knowledge (IFSW & IASSW, 2020).

Important areas for study include the changing relationship between people and institutions; new forms of inequality and exclusion; cultural and social diversity; digital and technology-mediated practice; environmental and climate-related concerns; migration and displacement; public emergencies; and the continuing need to connect individual wellbeing with structural conditions.

These are contexts and trends, not a fixed list of predictions. Their significance differs across countries and practice settings, and professional responses should remain grounded in ethics, evidence, context and service-user participation.

08

Social Work practice settings

Social Work is practiced across diverse settings because social problems and human needs occur across institutions and communities. The profession's historical development included hospitals, schools, child welfare agencies, family agencies and community settings; later developments expanded practice into many additional fields (Stuart, 2013).

  • Health and mental health: work within health and psychosocial service systems.
  • Family and child welfare: support, protection, family services and related interventions.
  • Schools and education: work connecting students, families, schools and wider support systems.
  • Community and voluntary organizations: community-based support, organization and development.
  • Workplace and labour settings: welfare, organizational and employee-related services.
  • Public and social welfare services: administration, service delivery and policy-linked practice.
  • Research, policy and advocacy: knowledge production, programme development, evaluation and social action.

The setting changes the population, institutional constraints, ethical issues and intervention possibilities. The underlying professional commitments remain connected to wellbeing, dignity, human rights, social justice, relationships and competent practice.

Unit I review

What to remember

  • Social Work is both a practice-based profession and an academic discipline.
  • Its orientation connects individual wellbeing with social and environmental context.
  • Modern professional Social Work developed through both individualized helping and social reform traditions.
  • India's professional Social Work education has a landmark institutional beginning in 1936 with the Dorabji Tata Graduate School of Social Work.
  • Values, ethics and competence are related but distinct concepts.
  • Theory provides conceptual frameworks for understanding and practice; the syllabus does not prescribe one exhaustive theory list.
  • Practice occurs across diverse settings and responds to changing social conditions.
APA 7

References

  1. Dash, B. M. (2017). Revisiting eight decades of social work education in India. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 11(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12114
  2. Deacon, L., & Macdonald, S. (2017). Social work theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
  3. International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). Global definition of social work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/
  4. International Federation of Social Workers, & International Association of Schools of Social Work. (2020). Global standards for social work education and training. https://www.ifsw.org/global-standards-for-social-work-education-and-training/
  5. Langer, C. L., & Lietz, C. (2014). Applying theory to generalist social work practice. Wiley.
  6. Mattaini, M. A. (2008). Ecosystems theory. In K. M. Sowers, C. N. Dulmus, & B. A. Thyer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470373705.chsw002015
  7. National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
  8. Stuart, P. H. (2013). Social work profession: History. In Encyclopedia of social work. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.623
  9. Tata Group. (n.d.). Tata Institute of Social Sciences. https://www.tata.com/community/education/tata-institute-of-social-sciences-tiss
  10. Thompson, J. B., Spano, R., & Koenig, T. L. (2019). Back to Addams and Richmond: Was social work really a divided house in the beginning? Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 46(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.4074
  11. University of Michigan School of Social Work. (n.d.). From charitable volunteers to architects of social welfare: A brief history of social work. https://ssw.umich.edu/about/history/brief-history-of-social-work